🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as among the biggest scams of its nature in the United Kingdom.

Altogether 14 defendants have been convicted for their part in a £28 million conspiracy to defraud more than 3,500 holiday ownership investors.

The targets were keen to terminate decades-old holiday ownership agreements and sought out support.

The majority were in the age range of 60 and 80. More than 500 of them surrendered more than £10,000, and a single victim handed over in excess of £80,000.

Those affected were exposed to high-pressure sales meetings extending for six hours. They were out of money, holding valueless fake "credits" and continued to be bound by high-priced vacation property deals they frequently were unable to use.

The Business At the Heart of the Scam

The firm at the centre of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They accepted people's money to support the directors' lavish lifestyle of private schools, luxury homes and personal aircraft.

The leader at the top of the company, the company director, was given a seven-and-half year prison term in January for conspiracy to defraud.

On Friday, his spouse Nicola was one of the final three to learn their fate.

She received a 24-month deferred imprisonment at the London court after confessing to illegal fund handling.

The outcome represents a long time coming and signifies a major victory for the victims who came forward, the police and the Crown.

The Way the Investigation Was Initiated

The initial awareness of the company was in the summer of 2016. The role involved in the reporting team of a news organization, producing investigative features.

A friend mentioned that his mother had taken over the rights of a vacation unit in a European resort and, after long-term use, had commenced searching to get out of the deal.

It is important to recall how widespread timeshares had evolved with British holidaymakers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Holiday ownership enabled people to occupy the same accommodation every year, or swap their weeks with other owners who had apartments in alternative destinations. Approximately 600,000 holiday enthusiasts accepted that opportunity.

The initial boom was accompanied by a lot of reports about dishonest operators mis-selling units. They appeared frequently on consumer shows.

The typical timeshare contract bound owners for decades.

At that time, those holders who had experienced their regular accommodation in the sunshine for decades were advancing in years, and many were attempting to end their association to their vacation investments.

Some had declining mobility and found it difficult to access their properties. A few just believed they'd achieved their goals from them. And some had deceased, in numerous instances passing on their family members to take over the contracts - including their yearly fees and upkeep costs.

The Investigation Unfolds

This was the situation the relative had ended up. She browsed the internet for answers and discovered SMT, a business whose online presence claimed to terminate her agreement.

But, having made a payment and arranged an appointment with them, her family smelled a rat.

Additional investigation showed hundreds of people claiming they had paid money and received no benefit out of it. Indeed, they had been left out of pocket. A lot of it.

The reporting group began investigating what was happening. It was rapidly apparent that there were dubious individuals active in the vacation property industry.

One lawyer had many grievance cases preparing to take action against SMT.

The team interviewed individuals who had dealt with the organization and they each reported similar experiences. They thought the business would purchase their timeshare away from them but when they attended a meeting (for which they paid up front) they were told there was no potential buyers.

In place of that, they were persuaded - indeed coerced - to commit further cash acquiring "the company's points system", named after the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.

The precise definition was somewhat vague. They sounded like a form of credit, providing discount travel and services and shopping deals.

And they were seemingly "exchangeable with other owners, some time down the line.

Investing money up front now would result in an future return that would offset the firm's costs and result in the timeshare holder in profit, freed at last from their troublesome agreement.

An unrealistic promise? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Misleading Tactic'

Assuming these reports were correct, this was a large-scale fraud.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

A business - specifically the company - "lures the customer by marketing a specific service and then state it cannot be provided, steering the customer to an alternative, lesser offering.

This is against the law. Armed with all the evidence we had collected, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the firm's consultations.

Such an operation demands time, effort, and clear arguments for why this is the exclusive approach to gather the evidence necessary to prove wrongdoing.

With approval secured, our compact group arranged a consultation with one of the company's representatives in the location.

Posing as a potential client wanting to get his mum out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement